BoardWise

Synthetic demo

Persona launcher

Switch between the seeded alpha roles with real password and MFA sessions. Each card opens the workspace that best demonstrates that role's access boundary.

Demo mode enabled

No active demo session

Normal sign in

Step 1

Choose the scenario

12 seeded governance scenarios

Ordinary board-pack review

Directors have read the clean Novara pack, added private notes, and responded to a management attention question.

Anonymous feedback and peer review

A governance concern has been quality checked, routed to reviewers, and one item has been promoted for full-board attention.

Decision at a board meeting

selected

A published meeting resolution has eligible voters, quorum metadata, and linked board-pack evidence ready for the meeting.

Unanimous written decision

A written-consent resolution shows named agreement, a 100 percent threshold, and no anonymous ballot route.

Chair-conflicted decision

A chair-office decision excludes the conflicted chair and uses an independent presiding officer.

Protected concern involving the chair

A sealed protected concern involving chair conduct is routed away from the chair to independent governance control.

Protected controller recusal

A protected case shows recusal and reassignment history while keeping reporter material sealed.

Senior independent director departs mid-case

A protected case transfer demonstrates continuity when the senior independent director can no longer hold the case.

Chair leaves before replacement

A governance-hold resolution shows chair vacancy handling and independent interim oversight.

All internal governance routes conflicted

Protected governance matters fall back to the external provider when internal routes are conflicted.

External provider becomes unavailable

A locked external route demonstrates safe state when the external provider is unavailable.

Cross-role permission boundaries

Compare chair, director, management, and external views to confirm private notes and protected material stay scoped.

Selected scenario

Decision at a board meeting

A published meeting resolution has eligible voters, quorum metadata, and linked board-pack evidence ready for the meeting.

Then choose a role

Avery Brooks

Company secretary

recommendedNovara board pack

Board-pack assurance and release readiness

Inspect the formal resolution record, linked papers, and voting-readiness state.

  • Check the clean pack and release readiness.
  • Review director questions before the board meeting.
  • Confirm the Pack Assurance caveat is phrased safely.

Evelyn Hart

Chair

recommendedBoard oversight

Assurance review and governance oversight

See the chair view of the meeting decision before ballots open at the meeting.

  • See board-pack readiness and assurance status.
  • Review anonymous feedback promoted for board attention.
  • Check resolution and protected-concern boundaries.

Morgan Price

Director

recommendedFinance view

Released board-pack and director boundary view

Confirm Morgan can inspect the record before the meeting vote opens.

  • Review finance, liquidity, and going-concern papers.
  • See only Morgan's own private annotations.
  • See Chair-routed board-visible notes without being asked for peer review.

Taylor Okafor

Director

recommendedLegal view

Legal, regulatory, and protected-governance view

Confirm Taylor can inspect the record before the meeting vote opens.

  • Review risk, cyber, and legal papers.
  • See legal-route scenarios without other directors' private notes.
  • Check conflicted-decision boundaries.

Riley Chen

Director

Technology view

Technology and operations review

  • Review product, operations, and cyber materials.
  • See peer-review work assigned to this director.
  • Confirm management-only material remains excluded.

Casey Martin

Management

Meetings

Management access boundary

  • See the operational meeting workspace available to management.
  • Confirm protected concern and private director material is excluded.
  • Check that board administration actions are not available.

Jordan Singh

Senior independent director

Protected concerns

Peer review and protected concern routing

  • Review concern routing from the independent director perspective.
  • Confirm conflict-aware controller boundaries.
  • Demonstrate peer-review style governance escalation.

Alex Morgan

External governance reviewer

Protected concerns

External fallback route

  • Show the external provider role in the protected concern workspace.
  • Confirm external review is scoped to assigned governance matters.
  • Demonstrate fallback readiness without exposing board-private data.

Anonymous reporter recovery

Open the public recovery-code status page without creating an authenticated board session.

Open recovery page